[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

CROSSPOSTINGS (was: Re: maize in Europe and India: a twisted tale

[Follow-ups are directed to: sci.archaeology,sci.anthropology, and
sci.bio.misc.]

[Newsgroups bionet.general,sci.agriculture,sci.bio.botany, and
sci.archaeology.mesoamerican have been edited out of the follow-ups line. 
This means that readers of these newsgroups will, it is to be hoped, not
see this discussion thread continuing in their groups.]

Peter van Rossum (pmv100@psu.edu) wrote:
: In article <5a554e$nk3@news1.io.org> yuku@io.org (Yuri Kuchinsky) writes:

: >BTW, and who is making these cross-posts now? I have reduced the
: >follow-ups on my original post specifically because some people
: >(including you!) complained about cross-posting. Perhaps it is your lack
: >of familiarity with elementary logic that makes you constantly contradict
: >yourself? Well, the cure is on its way -- just read the following this
: >time.

: I'm starting with this first, because it is a completely baseless
: accusation on your part. 

Not.

: YOU STARTED THIS "maize in Europe and India:
: a twisted tale" THREAD YESTERDAY.  YOU POSTED IT TO THE FOLLOWING
: GROUPS:
: 1. sci.archaeology
: 2. sci.archaeology.mesoamerican
: 3. bionet.general
: 4. sci.anthropology
: 5. sci.bio.misc
: 6. sci.agriculture
: 7. sci.bio.botany

Correct. But you completely missed the fact that I DIRECTED THE FOLLOW-UPS
TO A SMALLER NUMBER OF NGS! 

I posted my original message to more groups _because the message was
relevant_ to all those groups. Yet, I'm concerned about excessive
cross-posting, and THEREFORE, I reduced the follow-ups. 

I don't know why you missed all that. (I noted _specifically_ at the
beginning of that post about the reduced follow-ups.) It may be because of
the limitations of your newsreader software, or it may be because you're
unfamiliar with how headers in Usenet postings work? I'm satisfied that
this WAS NOT _intentional_ widening of cross-posts on your part, as I
originally supposed...

: I followed up and neglected to edit the newsgroups line, but it obviously
: WAS NOT ME WHO STARTED CROSS POSTING THIS THREAD IT WAS YOU.  So how
: about you apologize for this one?

Well, I think it's important to reduce cross-postings. Those readers of
other newsgroups who want to follow this discussion can simply read it in
the newsgroups listed in the reduced follow-up line. These ngs are:
sci.archaeology,sci.anthropology, and sci.bio.misc.
Follow-Ups: References: